About 133 minutes
Working Women of Japan — Edition Insights
Anthropology
30,435 recorded words. 52 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #35511This digital edition of A Treatise on the Six-Nation Indians — Reading Companion is described by source-level measurements including 18,591 words, 1 hr 21 min estimated reading time, and 2 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 36.6 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Iroquois Indians -- History,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 133 minutes
Anthropology
30,435 recorded words. 52 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #35511About 167 minutes
Anthropology
38,288 recorded words. 86 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #64069About 177 minutes
Anthropology
40,600 recorded words. 96 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #40881Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-25. Coverage: 100 public books, 100 available source excerpts.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Public-domain source text
The source text is kept in the dedicated reader, separate from this catalogue record and its commentary.
J. B. Mackenzie opens his treatise by acknowledging its origin as a lecture, preserved "without emendation," and immediately establishes a self-critical tone. He confesses to having misattributed a reflection on "revenge, mercilessness, implacability" to the Indian writer Rev. Peter Jones, later recognizing that Jones sought to fasten these blots on many whites as well. This early admission of fallibility sets a careful, reflexive stance for the work.
Mackenzie's stated plan is to trace the history of the six tribes—Mohawks, Tuscaroras, Onondagas, Senecas, Oneidas, and Cayugas—from their settlement in Brant County, Ontario, relying on frequent visits to the Grand River Reservation for oral data, supplemented by published records. He modestly anticipates that failure may stem from his own literary style rather than lack of material.
Mackenzie devotes careful attention to the legal and practical conditions governing the Indian's occupation of the Reserve. He details the terms of settlement, though the excerpt cuts off mid-sentence, leaving the full conditions incomplete. Earlier, in the preface, he corrects his own previous characterization of Indian character, noting that his expression "discovering in him such in-dwelling monsters as revenge, mercilessness, implacability" was not ingenuous. He now presents Rev. Peter Jones's position: that while these are blots on Indian nature, they are also found among whites. This self-revision suggests Mackenzie is striving for fairness, even as he works within a colonial framework.
Readers should note that the treatise's structure as a lecture means arguments unfold sequentially, with occasional asides and corrections. The opening pages thus serve as both an apology and a methodological statement, grounding the work in personal observation and acknowledged bias.
In the section on intellectual gifts, Mackenzie adopts a cautious, conditional tone. He argues that it is "equally idle and unprofitable" to measure Indian mental capabilities without proper stimulating influences, and blames "repressive legislation" for a "deplorable state of inertness." He notes that in a few cases where Indians entered professions, they tended to subordinate practice to less exacting callings. However, he praises memory as "undoubtedly the Indian's strong point," citing the interpreter's ability to reproduce long speeches with minuteness.
Mackenzie then speculates that even with discipline, the Indian might lack powers of concentration and concludes there is "slight ground for thinking him capable" of imperiling white intellectual eminence. This passage reveals the tension in Mackenzie's view: he acknowledges external constraints and specific strengths, yet falls back on assumptions of inherent limitation. The reader should weigh his evidence—anecdotal and secondhand—against his conclusions.
Mackenzie turns to lacrosse as the Indian's national game, noting that the "agile form" nature has gifted him is essential for success. He observes that while a white team may have two or three faster runners, the Indians as a whole hold their own. The excerpt breaks off before completing the comparison, but the pattern is clear: Mackenzie uses physical traits to explain cultural practices.
This section is one of the few where Mackenzie describes an activity without immediate moral judgment. He presents lacrosse as a straightforward fact of Indian life, linking it to physique rather than character. The reader may note that the treatise's structure moves from settlement conditions to intellectual capacity to pastimes, suggesting a deliberate progression from external circumstances to internal traits to daily life. The incomplete sentence leaves the reader wondering how Mackenzie would have concluded his assessment of Indian athleticism versus white.
Mackenzie's work is valuable not only for its content but for what it reveals about late 19th-century ethnographic writing. His preface admits the lecture form and his intention to preserve it without emendation, giving the text an oral, provisional quality. He cites "authors of repute and standing, native as well as white," yet the only named Indian writer is Rev. Peter Jones, and the excerpts show Mackenzie wrestling with Jones's views.
The treatise's catalog subjects—Iroquois history, treaties, social life and customs—are addressed unevenly. The excerpts focus on settlement conditions, intellectual gifts, and pastimes, but treaties are not mentioned in the available text. Readers should be aware that the work is a lecture, not a comprehensive study, and that Mackenzie's perspective is that of an outsider making "frequent visits" to the Reserve. His self-correction in the preface is a rare moment of methodological transparency for the period.
Mackenzie's treatise rewards readers who attend to its prefatory self-doubt and its conditional phrasing. The work is best approached as a primary source on settler attitudes toward the Six Nations in the late 1800s, rather than as an authoritative account of Iroquois life. The gaps in the excerpts—particularly the missing details on treaties and the abrupt end of the pastimes section—remind us that the full text may contain further nuance. Readers interested in the intersection of personal observation, colonial policy, and ethnographic writing will find much to analyze in Mackenzie's careful, if limited, account.
Sometimes a book stays because it treats old voices with care, not just facts. Mackenzie’s treatise on the Six Nations feels that way, quiet and self-questioning. I caught that same earnest hush in The Witch-cult in Western Europe: A Study in Anthropology — Inside the Classic, where beliefs once dismissed are handled gently, like something worth remembering rather than fixing.
Use these questions to collect your thoughts before moving on.